C.I.T. Corporation v. Corley

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Acting Associate Justice E. D. Eide.

We quote the following excerpt from the statement contained in the printed Transcript of Record:

“On May 26, 1939, the C. E T. Corporation brought suit in the Richland Countjr Court against the defendant, T. E. Corley, to recover the possession of an automobile over which the plaintiff held a conditional sales agreement or chattel mortgage. The suit brought was the usual claim and delivery action for the possession of personal property, with affidavit and bond for the immediate possession. The defendant, T. E.…