Legal Opinion
In Re. Bowen
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 7, 1938No. 14615PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
February 7, 1938. The opinion of the Court was delivered by On June 2, 1937, the appellants, W.E. Bowen and Dakyns B. Stover, County Attorneys for the County of Greenville, which is embraced within the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, made an ex parte application to his Honor, T.S. Sease, resident Circuit Judge of the adjoining Seventh Circuit, at his chambers in Spartanburg, for an order authorizing the payment of extra compensation to them as such attorneys, under Section 33 of the Greenville County Supply Act (Acts 1937, page 1071). The petition presented to Judge Sease was accompanied by an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Furgeson v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Watts v. DullIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Truesdell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Ex Parte PearsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Kaylor v. HillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- PEOPLES NAT'L BANK OF G'VILLE v. Manos Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- Greenville County v. StoverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- Ex Parte Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- C.I.T. Corporation v. CorleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941