Legal Opinion

Fingado v. Wilson Braiding & Embroidering Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 10, 1917No. Gen. No. 22,300PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. James C. Martin, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDonald

Appellee, Gustave Fingado (plaintiff below), recovr ered a judgment against the Wilson Braiding & Embroidering Company for $1,928.78, to reverse which this writ of error is prosecuted.

Plaintiff in his statement of claim alleged that the account sued upon had been assigned to him for a valuable consideration. The statement of claim was supported by the affidavit of plaintiff’s attorney, wherein he alleged that the plaintiff was then the actual bona fide holder of said account.

Defendant filed an affidavit of merits, in which it disclaimed any and all knowledge or notice of the supposed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shattuck v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Hinkle v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Hadden v. LarnedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  4. Leemon v. Grand Crossing Tack Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  5. Edwards & Bradford Lumber Co. v. BontjesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  2. Peterson v. Iris Theatre Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  3. Snite v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  4. Winitt v. KornblithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API