Leemon v. Grand Crossing Tack Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. David Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely
Harry 0. Leemon, plaintiff, brought suit for wages earned by Jure Tomich while in the employ of the defendant and assigned to plaintiff, and recovered judgment.
Defendant seeks a defense in what is said to be the contract of employment of Tomich. It says that its manner of paying employes is as follows: In the forenoon of Wednesday, following the week in which his compensation is earned, the employe applies to his foreman for a payroll card, in the blanks of which are inserted the name and number of employe, the amount of his compensation for the week ending on the preceding Saturday, the date…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sixby v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
- King v. RadekeIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fingado v. Wilson Braiding & Embroidering Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1917
- Peterson v. Iris Theatre Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920
- Illinois Midland Railway Co. v. Farmers State BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
- Lepman & Heggie v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1915
- Winitt v. KornblithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928