Legal Opinion

Dant & Russell, Inc. v. Ostlind

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover the sum of $50,000 on a promissory note dated February 1, 1929, payable three years after date, with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum. From judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount of the note, with interest and attorney’s fees, the defendant appeals.

The assignments of error relied upon by defendant on this appeal are directed principally to the ruling of the trial judge in sustaining demurrers to the three separate defenses, and to the sufficiency of the complaint, a question raised in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Portland National Bank v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Smith v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Faris v. BeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. Security National Bank v. WestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weiss v. NORTHWEST ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Buckman v. Hill Military AcademyOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Albergo v. GigliottiUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Parkinson v. DiefenderferMontana Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API