Legal Opinion

Gage v. Express Personnel

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2000No. 25499PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This is a worker’s compensation ease. For the following reasons we reverse the Industrial Commission’s decision to deny benefits to Amanda Gage.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

On June 24, 1996, Amanda Gage was an employee of Express Personnel Services, a job placement service providing temporary staff to contracting employers. Gage was sent to work at Amerieold, a storage and shipping company dealing in frozen food products, where she was to label boxes of product. Gage had worked at Amerieold more than twenty times before, at different locations in the company’s two buildings and at the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Neufeld v. Browning Ferris IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Beutler v. MacGregor Triangle CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Murdoch v. Humes SwanstromIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Colson v. SteeleIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Smith v. J.B. Parson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vawter v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Atkinson v. 2M Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Kelly v. Blue Ribbon Linen Supply, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Atkinson v. 2M Company, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Kelly v. Blue Ribbon Linen Supply, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API