Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. 2M Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 2019No. Docket No. 45918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBevan, Justice

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

2M Company Inc. ("2M") appeals an Industrial Commission ("Commission") decision that determined Matthew Atkinson was entitled to reasonable medical benefits for injuries he sustained in an accident on his way to work. The Commission found that an exception to the "going and coming" rule applied based on 2M's intent to compensate Atkinson for his travel time while going to or coming from work. 2M and its surety, Employer Assurance Company, timely appealed. We affirm on different grounds.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

At the time of his accident, Atkinson was a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Uhl v. Ballard Medical Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Davaz v. Priest River Glass Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Eriksen v. Nez Perce CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hattenburg v. BlanksIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Zapata v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Austin v. Bio Tech NutrientsIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Thompson v. Burley Inn, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Action Collection Service Inc. v. HeimIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Austin v. Bio Tech NutrientsIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Coray v. Idaho Regional Hand & Upper Extremity CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API