Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Railroad v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 13, 1964No. 85-59PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDubeee, Judge

Plaintiff and its connecting carriers transported carload shipments of ammunition for cannon with explosive projectiles, ranging in size from 40 to 90 millimeters. The shipments moved from points of origin in Oregon, California, Arizona and New Mexico to points of destination on plaintiff’s lines in New Jersey and Ohio during 1948 through 1954.

After the services were performed, plaintiff billed and was paid freight charges computed under a through single factor class 65 rate from point of origin to destination, as provided *3in an A.A.R. Section 22 Quotation No. 14-A for carload shipments of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  3. Great Northern Railway Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Great Northern Railway Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Oak Forest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API