Legal Opinion

Owens v. Camfield

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 6, 1981No. CA 80-517PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Judge.

This appeal is from a chancery court decision which excepted two lots owned by appellees from a covenant restriction which limited the use of the lots for residential purposes only. The appellants own lots in the same subdivision in which appellees’ two lots are located and appellants affirmatively plead at the trial below that the appellees were not entitled to have the convenant restriction cancelled. Appellants contend on appeal that the Chancellor erred in: (1) imposing the wrong legal standard for determining when a restrictive convenant should be removed, and (2) that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Staninger v. Jacksonville Expressway AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Garot v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Hirsch v. HancockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Storthz v. Midland Hills Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  5. Robertson v. BerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Asociación de Vecinos de Villa Caparra, Inc. v. Iglesia CatólicaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
  2. El Di, Inc. v. Town of Bethany BeachSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Donald Cottle v. Mary DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. El Di, Inc. v. Town of Bethany BeachSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API