Legal Opinion

Botello v. Neuschmid

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 20, 2020No. 3:19-cv-06761Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RAY BOTELLO, Case No. 19-cv-06761-EMC 8 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR 9 v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 10 R. NEUSCHMID, 11 Respondent. 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Ray Botello filed this action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

in 16 which he claims that the state court’s failure to resentence him to give him the benefit of a change 17 in sentencing laws passed several years after his conviction violated his federal constitutional right 18 to equal protection of the laws. For the reasons…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Wilson v. SellersSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API