Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Rouse

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 26, 2005No. S04G1389PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, Justice.

We granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Rouse v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth., 266 Ga. App. 619 (597 SE2d 650) (2004), and posed this question: Does the requirement that common carriers exercise “extraordinary diligence to protect the lives and persons of their passengers” impose a duty upon those carriers to stay informed of safety advances in product design and to buy and incorporate those safety advances into previously-purchased, non-defective products?

Leslie Rouse was injured when her foot became entrapped under the comb plate of an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Otis Elevator Co. v. EmbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. Millar Elevator Service Co. v. O'SHIELDSCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Strobel v. ParkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Pinkerton's, Inc. v. Palmer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beach v. B. F. Saul Property Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Johns Hopkins Hospital v. CorreiaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Mays v. Valley View Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Rouse v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Anasia Maison v. NJ Transit Corporation and Kelvin CoatsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API