Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Rouse
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, Justice.
We granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Rouse v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth., 266 Ga. App. 619 (597 SE2d 650) (2004), and posed this question: Does the requirement that common carriers exercise “extraordinary diligence to protect the lives and persons of their passengers” impose a duty upon those carriers to stay informed of safety advances in product design and to buy and incorporate those safety advances into previously-purchased, non-defective products?
Leslie Rouse was injured when her foot became entrapped under the comb plate of an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Otis Elevator Co. v. EmbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Millar Elevator Service Co. v. O'SHIELDSCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Strobel v. ParkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Pinkerton's, Inc. v. Palmer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beach v. B. F. Saul Property Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Johns Hopkins Hospital v. CorreiaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Mays v. Valley View Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Rouse v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Anasia Maison v. NJ Transit Corporation and Kelvin CoatsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.