Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Arizona B.A.S.S. Federation

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 29, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 93-0405PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s granting of defendants’ motion for summary judgment in a negligence action. Because we disagree with the trial court’s conclusion that defendants owed no duty to plaintiffs’ deceased daughter, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS 1 AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On Sunday, May 3, 1992, defendant Grand Canyon Bass Busters (“GCBB”) sponsored a bass fishing tournament. The tournament originally had been planned for Alamo Lake but, because that lake was unavailable for the selected weekend, the GCBB membership voted to hold the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hafner v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. Stephens v. Bashas' Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Johnson v. PankratzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Kuczynski v. McLaughlinSuperior Court of Delaware · 2003
  5. Gipson v. KaseyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API