Legal Opinion

Beall v. New York & New Jersey Water Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 16, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On motion for the settlement and entry of decree.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Chancellor.

This canse was heard before the Hon. James E. Howell, vice-chancellor, who filed an opinion and died before advising a decree. Counsel for complainants, on due notice to defendants, have moved before me for the settlement of a decree in accordance with the views expressed in the late vice-chancellor’s opinion.

The vice-chancellor prefaced his opinion with a statement of the objects of the suit and the prayers for relief, and observed that the scope of the bill and application for relief are much broader than 'the points submitted at the hearing. After stating the relief to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Washington & Idaho Railroad v. Cœur D'Alene Railway & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. PoulsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1880
  2. In the Matter of Estate of BumstedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  3. Cintas v. American Car & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  4. Hendricks v. MountSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1820

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API