Legal Opinion

Hufstetler v. Department of Industrial Relations

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1930No. Docket No. 4159PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The petitioner seeks the annulment of an order of the Industrial Accident Commission denying compensation for injuries sustained by him in an automobile accident. The Commission found that, at the time of the accident, the petitioner was employed as a salesman by Weber & Beckett, whose insurance carrier was the State Compensation Insurance Fund, “all of whom were then subject to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Insurance and Safety Act of 1917” [Stats. 1917, p. 831], but that “the evidence does not establish as a fact that the applicant received an injury arising out of and in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Caldwell v. WeinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Waters v. BlocksomNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  2. De Laguna Spaulding v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Berg v. Journeymen's Plumbers & Gas Fitters UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Torrey v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API