Legal Opinion

Waterman v. Heinemann Bros.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The action is for recovery for injuries sustained in falling down a stairway in defendant’s store claimed to have resulted from violation of the safe-place statute (sec. 101.06). The jury found the stairway not safe because of the location near it of a notion counter and dress racks, insufficient lig'hting, and absence of signs. They found the plaintiff not negligent.(1) Defendant claims the findings are not supported by evidence, that is, that the place was safe as matter of law; (2) that the damages assessed are excessive; and (3) the instructions were prejudicially erroneous.

The stairway…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Skrzypczak v. KonieczkaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kuroske v. Ætna Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Candell v. SkaarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Schoenfeldt v. BabcockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Szalacinski v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  5. Dahl v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API