Legal Opinion

United States v. David Hooten

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 15, 1991No. 90-8566PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge:

David Hooten appeals his sentence imposed by the district court after he entered a guilty plea to the charge of conspiracy to manufacture amphetamine. He contends that the district court improperly adjusted his sentence contrary to Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c) and the federal sentencing guidelines, and that the government breached its plea agreement. We remand for resentencing in accordance with this opinion.

I. BACKGROUND

Hooten became involved in a methamphetamine production scheme after meeting Alan Ray Molloy. Molloy told Hooten he was looking for a place to set up a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. Eddie Wayne RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. Lynda Fallon v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Nicholas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. Manuel OteroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. United States v. Cisneros-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Puig-InfanteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. U.S. v. MergersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Octavio Carreon, and Armando MelendezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Amy Ralston Pofahl, Charles T. Nunn, and Randy WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API