Legal Opinion
Newday v. Peake
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided November 5, 2008No. 06-1801PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND
WILLIAM A. MOORMAN, Judge.
Pursuant to U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Rules 27(a) and 45(g), Appellant, Satya Newday, and Appellee, James B. Peake, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, by and through their respective counsel, respectfully move this Court to issue an order vacating, and remanding the September 21, 2005, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that denied entitlement to an effective date pri- *263or to November 30, 2000 for a grant of service connection for tinnitus. R. at 1-11.
For the purposes of this remand only, the parties accept the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fletcher v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Allday v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- Quarles v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Thurber v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Howard F. Roberson, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- And Alfred R. Young v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
- And Alfred R. Young v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009