Crittenden v. Schermerhorn
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley, Oh. J.:
In this case the bill of exceptions was settled by the judge who tried the cause, after he had retired from office. It appears, however, to have been done under the permission of a stipulation entered into by counsel for the respective parties.
The defendant in error now raises the objection that a stipulation could confer no such authority. The point is well taken. But it does not follow that the judgment should be affirmed. On the contrary, where a party has lost the benefit of his exceptions from causes beyond his control, it is proper to give him a new trial; and this we…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Richardson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
- J. W. Ripey Son v. the Art Wall Paper MillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Nelson v. MarshallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1904
- Tegler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.