Legal Opinion

Pittsburg Coal & Mining Co. v. Wright

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1927No. 11903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This was an action for cancellation of a d'eed and to remove cloud on title to certain real estate covered by said deed and lying in Pittsburg county, Okla.

Plaintiff below, Nettie Hayes Wright, though recognizing t£e existence and due recordation of the deed in question in her petition, yet denied its 'execution, alleging that she had never signed same and denying the truth of the notary’s certificate of acknowledgment, and praying for cancellation of such deed.

Th’e decisive issue of fact tried below was whether the plaintiff, Nettie Hayes Wright, had in fact signed and acknowledged said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dyal v. NortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Thorn v. ConeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Garber v. HauserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Neff v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Winn v. WillmottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Fitzsimmons v. TrosperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Owens v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Equitable Farm Mortgage Co. v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Posey v. Van TuylSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API