Lankau v. Luxoft Holding, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Sweet, D.J
Defendants Luxoft USA, Inc. (“Luxoft USA”) and Luxoft Holding, Inc. (“Luxoft Holding”) (collectively, the “Defendants” or “Luxoft”) have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint of Plaintiff Maik Lankau (“Lankau” or the “Plaintiff’) (the “Complaint”). Based on the conclusions set forth below, Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Prior Proceedings
Plaintiff filed his Complaint in this diversity action on November 9,. 2016, (Dkt. 1.) In .the Complaint, Plaintiff alleges: fraudulent inducement by Defendants (Compl. ¶¶…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wolo Mfg. Corp. v. ABC Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Brown v. Prove Identity, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Catalano v. MarineMaxDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Douglas v. Dry Clean Concepts, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Honeywell International Inc. v. Buckeye Partners, L.P.District Court, N.D. New York · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.