Hogan Lumber Co. v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order refusing a new trial. N. D. Arnot, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action of claim and delivery.
Very briefly the facts are these: Hansbrough Brothers Company entered into a contract with the city of Oakland to build a quay wall along a certain portion of the Oakland water front. For use in the construction of the quay wall, this company, with materials furnished by it, built a temporary wharf or platform on the land side of said wall, which was used to pass materials over, and to facilitate the work of construction. When the work was partially completed, the Hansbrough…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mills v. Taunton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Binkley v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Lavenson v. Standard Soap Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- California Portland Cement Co. v. Wentworth Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Stimson Mill Co. v. Los Angles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.