State v. Barry
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.
Defendant William Barry was charged with aiding and abetting one Byrne in the commission of grand larceny by means of fraudulent representations, and by trick, device, and bunco, and with knowingly receiving and concealing a part of the money wrongfully appropriated. He has appealed from the judgment and sentence entered upon the jury’s verdict of guilty.
The bunco game was a well planned and skillfully executed scheme which was carried out by three persons: Fisco, Siegel, and Byrne (hereafter referred to as the “bunco team”). Fisco contacted the victim and induced him to engage in a morals…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. CoferIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. HeatonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. KleinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. TweedyWashington Supreme Court · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. CoruzziNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.