Ruzic v. City of Eden Prairie
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.*
Respondent appealed assessment for improvements made by appellant City of Eden Prairie in district court. The trial court denied the city’s motion for summary judgment based on respondent’s waiver of the right to appeal. The trial court concluded the statutory right to appeal could not be waived and appellant failed to follow proper procedure by not assessing all bene-fitted properties. Therefore, the trial court granted summary judgment for respondent, ordering reassessment of all benefit-fed properties.
The trial court granted summary judgment for appellant on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Abdallah, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Karon v. KaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re the Welfare of B.C.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995