Legal Opinion
United States v. Ramiro Trejo-Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 23, 2007No. 05-6078PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, J. (p. 414), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
OPINION
JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Ramiro Trejo-Mar-tinez (“Trejo”) appeals the sentence imposed by the district court for his illegal reentry into the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). The government argues that we are without jurisdiction to hear Trejo’s appeal because the district court imposed a sentence within the now adviso*411ry guidelines and Trejo does not challenge the district court’s underlying guidelines…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Lydia CooperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Bernard Chester WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Leonard Jermain WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. VowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Jose Solano-RosalesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Sathon EvansCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.