Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. Keyes

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1929No. File No. 6007Published

1DissentBrown, J.

The opinion in this case states that all the elements of a cause of action for malicious prosecution are established except these two: First, malice; second, want of probable cause.

The opinion -correctly states that malice may be inferred by the jury from want of probable cause, but that want of - probable cause cannot be inferred from any degree of express malice. The crucial question in the -case, therefore, is this: Has plaintiff sho-wn want of probable cause?

While it is true that where facts are undisputed, whether or not they constitute probable cause is a question of law for the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kolka v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State v. StumbaughSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. BaillySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Pierce v. LyonsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State v. JuliusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API