State v. Julius
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from- Circuit Court, Grant - County. Hon. Frank McNulty, Judge. Defendant, E. D. Julius, was convicted of violating -the liquor law relating to sales by a registered pharmacist; from which judgment and from an order denying a new trial he appeals.
Read the full summary
Appeal from- Circuit Court, Grant - County. Hon. Frank McNulty, Judge. Defendant, E. D. Julius, was convicted of violating -the liquor law relating to sales by a registered pharmacist; from which judgment and from an order denying a new trial he appeals. The information was filed under Section 2860 of the Revised Political Code of 1903, as -the -same was finally amended by Chapter 176, page 365, of the Daws of 1907. This section makes it unlawful for a registered pharmacist to- sell or give away liquors to be drank upon the premises or (to -be drank) in a room or •place adjoining the…
1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.
The defendant, having been -convicted of violating the statute relating to the selling of intoxicating liquors by a registered pharmacist, removed the record of such conviction to this court for review by an appeal from the judgment of the circuit court imposing a fine of $200, and from its order denying his application for a new trial.
[1] Section 2860 of the Revised Political Code, as amended, has these provisions: “It shall be lawful for any registered pharmacist owning -and conducting a pharmacy, whose certificate of registeration is in - force, to sell spirtuous or vinous liquors for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. BurchardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. KorthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. SjobergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Brown v. KeyesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. Walking BullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971