Legal Opinion
State v. York
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided November 7, 2000No. 05-00-00239-CRPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By Justice FITZGERALD.
The State of Texas appeals the trial court’s orders granting Jay Andrew York’s motions to quash three informations charging him with indecent exposure. See Tex. Code Crim.Piioc.Ann. art. 44.01(a)(1) (Vernon Supp.2000). For reasons that follow, we reverse the trial court’s orders and remand these causes to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Background
The State filed three informa-tions in the trial court charging York with the misdemeanor offense of indecent exposure. Each information alleged that on or about March 4,1999,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- DeVaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Riney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Lacour v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- State v. EdmondCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Galliford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- Yanes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Williamson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
- Hankins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.