Dressel v. Ameribank
Michigan Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceWeaver, J.
I concur with the majority that the filling out of standardized mortgage documents does not constitute the practice of law.
I disagree, however, with the reasoning employed by the majority in reaching this conclusion. Specifically, I seriously question the majority’s attempt to formulate a comprehensive definition of the “practice of law.” Such a definition runs contrary to prior precedent and appears to contribute little clarity or guidance to the unauthorized-practice-of-law analysis.
This Court has long held that the “practice of law” defies precise definition. “ ‘Even if possible, it is not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fought & Co. v. Steel Engineering & Erection, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- State Bar v. CramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Grand Rapids Bar Ass'n v. DenkemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Ingham County Bar Ass'n v. Walter Neller Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Detroit Bar Ass'n v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.