Legal Opinion

Boynton v. Boland

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 14, 1996No. CA 9407075PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs John W. Boynton (“Boynton”) and Albert E. Winemiller (“Winemiller”) filed this action seeking to compel defendant William T. Boland (“Boland”) to contribute towards a debt owed to Shawmut Bank,. N.A. (“Shawmut”). This case is before the Court on consideration of plaintiffs’ and defendant’s motions for summary judgment under Mass.R.Civ.P. 56.

*79BACKGROUND

The following undisputed facts are drawn from the submissions of the parties.3 Boynton, Winemiller and Boland are investors in the DownTime Corporation (“DownTime”), a business incorporated in Massachusetts in March, 1987…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chaplin v. QuinnMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API