Consolidated Textiles, Inc. v. Sprague
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Contex has filed a motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal as interlocutory, and argues that a substantial right is not affected by the injunction because Sprague continues to work as a salesman for Stein. For the reasons stated below, the motion is allowed.
“No appeal lies from a trial court’s grant of an interlocutory preliminary injunction unless the defendant would be deprived of a substantial right which he would lose absent a review prior to final determination.” Triangle Leasing Co. v. McMahon, 96 N.C. App. 140, 146, 385 S.E.2d 360, 363 (1989), aff’d in part, rev’d in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Triangle Leasing Co. v. McMahonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Milner Airco, Inc. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Masterclean of North Carolina, Inc. v. GuyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- TRIANGLE LEASING CO., INC. v. McMahonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bessemer City Express, Inc. v. City of Kings MountainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- A&D Envtl. Servs., Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Sia Grp., Inc. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017