Legal Opinion

Consolidated Textiles, Inc. v. Sprague

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 1994No. 9426SC180PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Contex has filed a motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal as interlocutory, and argues that a substantial right is not affected by the injunction because Sprague continues to work as a salesman for Stein. For the reasons stated below, the motion is allowed.

“No appeal lies from a trial court’s grant of an interlocutory preliminary injunction unless the defendant would be deprived of a substantial right which he would lose absent a review prior to final determination.” Triangle Leasing Co. v. McMahon, 96 N.C. App. 140, 146, 385 S.E.2d 360, 363 (1989), aff’d in part, rev’d in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Triangle Leasing Co. v. McMahonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Milner Airco, Inc. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Masterclean of North Carolina, Inc. v. GuyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. TRIANGLE LEASING CO., INC. v. McMahonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bessemer City Express, Inc. v. City of Kings MountainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. A&D Envtl. Servs., Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Sia Grp., Inc. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API