Legal Opinion
Masterclean of North Carolina, Inc. v. Guy
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided July 15, 1986No. 8621DC131PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Our first line of inquiry is whether the preliminary injunction entered by the trial court against defendant deprives defendant of a substantial right which he would lose absent a review prior to a final determination on the merits of this case. In A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClure, 308 N.C. 393, 302 S.E. 2d 754 (1983), the Supreme Court of North Carolina stated the following:
A preliminary injunction is interlocutory in nature, issued after notice and hearing, which restrains a party pending final determination on the merits. Pursuant to G.S. 1-277 and G.S. 7A-27, no appeal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Ridge Community Investors, Inc. v. BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Welcome Wagon International, Inc. v. PenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Robins & Weill, Inc. v. MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hartman v. WH Odell and Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Precision Walls, Inc. v. ServieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Jeffrey R. Kennedy, D.D.S., P.A. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Sentilles Optical Services v. PhillipsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- QSP, INC. v. HairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.