Legal Opinion

Husney v. O'DONNELL

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1979No. 10785, 10940 and 11105PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.;

Three separate cases regarding sex offenses allegedly committed by Seymour Husney were consolidated for hearing *469before this court. By petition for writ of prohibition he challenges the jurisdiction of the district court to proceed upon one of the indictments, and by appeal from orders denying habeas relief, he asserts additional claims of error with regard to the other two indictments. We turn to consider each in order.

Case No. 10785.

The grand jury directed the district attorney to prepare an indictment charging Husney with statutory sexual seduction.1 The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Adler v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Garnick v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Sardis v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Houser v. Fourth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Slobodian v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Konstantinidis v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hardin v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Husney v. O'DONNELLNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. Thomas (Lacy)Nevada Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API