Legal Opinion

Garnick v. First Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1965No. 4992PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to bar her trial before respondents on an amended information charging the issuance of a check against insufficient funds. NRS 205.130 — set forth in pertinent part in the margin.

Petitioner asserts that said amended information does not charge an offense against the laws of the State of Nevada. For convenience we here set forth the amended information in which we have noted by including in brackets the parts thereof that were added to the original information:

“That said defendant on the 4th day of September, A.D., 1963, or…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Sullivan v. AsheSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Joni Goldyn v. Loy HayesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Walker v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Vincze v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Larsen v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Logan v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API