State v. Thomas (Lacy)

546, 550,

188 P.3d 51, 54

(2008). We review questions of statutory interpretation and issues involving constitutional challenges de novo. See State v. Lucero, 127 Nev. „

249 P.3d 1226, 1228

(2011); West v. State, 119 Nev. 410, 419,

75 P.3d 808, 814

(2003). Sufficiency of the indictment The State argues that the indictment sufficiently put Thomas on notice of the specific conduct alleged to constitute theft and misconduct of a public officer because the indictment alleged that Thomas used funds entrusted to him for improper purposes. The State further argues that the indictment provided more notice…