Legal Opinion

Zeller v. Dahl

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1972PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a verdict and judgment for defendant in a personal injury case arising from a head-on automobile accident. The principal assignment of error is that the trial court erred in sustaining defendant’s objection to testimony of an ambulance driver relating to an allegedly “excited utterance” by plaintiff. ① We affirm.

Plaintiff made an offer of proof of testimony by the ambulance driver that after he arrived at the scene of the accident and while he was placing a bandage on plaintiff’s head “she said numerous times, ‘Why were they on the wrong side of the road; why were they…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joseph v. LoweryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. HutchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Bosin v. Oak Lodge Sanitary District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Wright v. SwannOregon Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Carter v. MoberlyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Christensen v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Doe v. ThomasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API