Legal Opinion

Doe v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 15, 1984No. Record 811910PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoff, J.

On this appeal, the dispositive issue is whether the trial court committed reversible error by admitting into evidence an extrajudicial statement under the spontaneous-declaration exception to the hearsay rule. The appellant, defendant below, also challenges the credibility of the evidence underlying the plaintiffs verdict.

Charles Randolph Thomas filed a motion for judgment against John Doe, an unknown motorist, seeking damages for personal injuries which he alleged were the proximate result of Doe’s negligent operation of his automobile. The medical evidence showed that, as a result of his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Skillern & Sons, Inc. v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Weddle, Administratrix v. DraperSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  3. Simpson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. McNeelySupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  5. Bosin v. Oak Lodge Sanitary District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  2. Riner v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  3. Neal v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  4. Simpson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. Robinson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API