Legal Opinion
Bucur v. Vithlani CA4/2
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 2016No. E063738Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 2/3/16 Bucur v. Vithlani CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO VIOREL BUCUR, Plaintiff and Appellant, E063738 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1500708) DILIP VITHLANI, OPINION Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Mock v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Chavez v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- 1-800 CONTACTS, INC. v. SteinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.