Legal Opinion
David Carl Hepfl v. Jodine Patrice Meadowcroft
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 24, 2024No. A221706PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A22-1706 Court of Appeals Hudson, C.J. Dissenting, Chutich, McKeig, JJ. Took no part, Hennesy, J. David Carl Hepfl, Respondent, vs. Filed: July 24, 2024 Office of Appellate Courts Jodine Patrice Meadowcroft, Appellant. ________________________ Perry A. Berg, Tyler L. Behrns, Patton, Hoversten & Berg, P.A., Waseca, Minnesota, for respondent. Michelle K. Olsen, Jacob M. Birkholz, Birkholz & Associates, LLC, Mankato, Minnesota, for appellant. ________________________ SYLLABUS The district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that a property owner…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Cady v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Brand v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Schumacher v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- John S. Uphoff v. Geofrey Lemond and Capture Design Ventures 03, LLC; Geoffrey LeMond and Capture Design Ventures 03, LLC v. John Uphoff, Matt Duea, Anthony Brennan, Allen Temiz, Raw Entertainment B.V. d/b/a Roobet, Raw Entertainment Ltd. d/b/a Roobet, Packdraw Limited, Packdraw US LLC, and PDCC Services LimitedDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026