People v. Chavez
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rice
11 In this ongmal proceeding, we are asked to decide whether a trial court has the authority to grant a defendant's discovery motion seeking access to the private residence of a non-party-here, the alleged victim.1 Because the trial court lacked the authority to order such: access, we hold that it abused its discretion. We therefore make the rule absolute.
I. Facts and f’rdcedural History
12 The defendant, Saul Chavez, has been charged with one count of sexual assault. The alleged victim.lives in a home with other members of her family. The People allege that .Chavez,. a family friend, had been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spahmer v. GulletteSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Stackhouse v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- People Ex Rel. Shinn v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Warden v. Exempla, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Gansz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People ex rel. E.G.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- In Re The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff: v. Juan Manuel Castorena, Defendant:Supreme Court of Colorado · 2026
- In re People v. ChavezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- People in the Interest of E.GSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- People in the Interest of E.GSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016