Legal Opinion

Stackhouse v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 29, 2015No. Supreme Court Case 12SC1029PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rice

¶ 1 In this case, we granted certiorari to consider whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that the defendant waived his public trial claim by failing to object to the closure of the courtroom during jury selection. This question turns largely on whether our precedent in Anderson v. People, 176 Colo. 224, 490 P.2d 47, 48 (1971)—holding that a defendant affirmatively waives his public trial right by not objecting to a known closure of the courtroom—remains controlling precedent, or whether it has been abrogated by the more recent United States Supreme Court decisions in Waller v.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  2. People v. HassenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  3. People ex rel. E.G.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  4. on v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  5. People v. AllgierColorado Court of Appeals · 2018

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API