Valhouli v. Coulouras
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
The principal issue is whether the plaintiffs in the circumstances of this case are precluded by laches from enforcing the violation of a restrictive covenant running with the land by the defendant. The residential restriction, which limited the owners to the erection of a single dwelling for either one or two families, was a reasonable one which was valid and binding on the parties to this litigation. Johnson v. Shaw, 101 N. H. 182; Winnipesaukee &c. Ass’n v. Gordon, 63 N. H. 505. See Nashua Hospital v. Gage, 85 N. H. 335. For the purposes of this case it may be assumed, without deciding the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Wischmeyer v. FinchIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Watters v. BlattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
3Cited by13 opinions
- Appeal of PlantierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Jenot v. White Mountain Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- North Bay Council, Inc. v. GrinnellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Phinney v. LevineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.