Barkly v. Copeland
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Tehama County refusing to retax costs. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
— This is an appeal from an order refusing to retax a bill of costs presented by the defendant, who had succeeded in the action. There had been two trials of the case, and on each trial the evidence had been transcribed by the short-hand reporter. In the first instance, this was done upon the order of the court; at the second trial, it was done upon the order of the defendant, without any from the court. It is not entirely clear how much of the amount due to the short-hand reporter for the first transcript was paid by defendant and plaintiff, but it appears as if each one had paid…
2Cited by15 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Walton v. Bank of California, National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Cooper v. State Board of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Glass v. Gulf Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.