Legal Opinion

Lowry v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1918No. Civ. No. 2576PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

A demurrer to the complaint of plaintiff was sustained and plaintiff declining to amend, judgment followed in favor of the defendant. The appeal is from the judgment so rendered.

The facts which we will detail are fully expressed in the complaint: In January of the year 1912 William.Morgan died. He was at that time a resident of the county of Los Angeles. In February, 1912, his last will was duly admitted to probate and the appointment of plaintiff as executor thereof confirmed. Morgan, in his will, bequeathed his interest in two thousand shares of the capital stock of a safety vault company…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Catlin v. HullSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  2. Mackay v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. MacKay v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Stanford v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Anthony v. CaswellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Christman v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API