Legal Opinion
Canfield v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1910No. L.A. No. 2432PublishedCited by 2 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Appeals are taken from a judgment and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial in-this case and similar appeals are pending in two other eases which are practically identical with this one. They are Los Angeles Nos. 2433 and 2434 and are entitled Doheny v. County of Los Angeles, post, p. 624, [108 Pac. 707]. The briefs filed are pertinent to the appeals in all three of- these cases, and it is agreed that the decision in this one shall apply to the other two. Plaintiffs seek to recover taxes paid under protest upon the ground that an assessment of stock in a domestic…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee Ex Rel. MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Kelley v. RhoadsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Kelley v. RhoadsWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
- American Coal Co. v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- Commercial Bank v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Lacoe v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939