Legal Opinion

Lima v. Marshall

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 5, 2007No. 06-P-826PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRapoza, C.J.

The following facts are not in dispute. On February 1, 2001, the plaintiff, Esmeralda Lima, suffered a whiplash injury when the car she was driving was struck by a vehicle driven by the defendant, Jack Marshall (the February accident). One month later, on March 2, 2001, after incurring $436.35 in medical expenses related to the February accident, but before *425beginning a scheduled course of recommended physical therapy, Lima was involved in a second, unrelated car accident (the March accident). As a result of the March accident, Lima experienced low and middle back pain in addition to an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wallace v. LudwigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Victum v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Phelps v. MacIntyreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Vieira v. SchuppMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Holmgren v. LaLiberteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chenell v. Central Wheelchair & Van Transp., Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  2. Diekan v. BlackwelderMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API