Legal Opinion
Hoskins v. Hotel Randolph Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided December 16, 1927PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.
Plaintiff brought a prior action against the Hotel Randolph Company, Otis Elevator Company, and others, to recover for the injuries here in controversy, alleging them to have resulted from the negligence of the defendants. The Otis Elevator Company removed the cause to the Federal court. That court, on the Otis Elevator Company’s motion, held that there was a misjoinder of causes, and gave plaintiff leave to set them forth in separate petitions. The plaintiff then filed in the Federal court her petition ag'ainst the Otis Elevator Company, alleging that the Otis Elevator Company was negligent…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kuiken v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- State v. WoodSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
- Aluminum Co. Of America v. HullyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. Winget Kickernick Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Rose v. Third Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.