Legal Opinion
Bruner-Goodhue-Cooke-Cranz Agency Co. v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, P. J.
Plaintiff in error, the Bruner-Goodhue-Cooke-Cranz Agency Company, sued defendant in error, Susan B. Smith, on two promissory notes, which are alike in all respects except the due dates and the dates referred to in the last lines thereof. A copy of the first note is as follows:
“$1,000.00 Akron, Ohio, March 31, 1923.
“On or before April 1, 1924, after date, for value received, I promise to pay to the order of the Bruner-Goodhue-Cooke-Cranz Agency Company, at the office of the Dime Savings Bank, Akron, Ohio, one thousand dollars, with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent. (6%) per annum,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dermody v. New Jersey Realties, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
- Bush v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Goldsberry v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Webber v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gaston Drugs, Inc. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- WM. P. Zinn & Co. v. Shawnee Pottery Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1955
- Segal Brokerage Co. v. Lloyd L. Hughes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Kane v. Neptune Shipping, Ltda.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Frederick F. KELLER, Appellant, v. ORIX CREDIT ALLIANCE, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.