Legal Opinion
Kane v. Neptune Shipping, Ltda.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
The action is one for broker’s commissions claimed to have been earned in procuring a charter party. According to the agreed statement of facts, J. S. Gissel, plaintiff’s assignor, is a ship broker doing business under the name of Collin & Gissel in Houston, Texas. • Defendant Neptune Shipping, Ltda., S. A. (hereinafter called u Neptune ”) was the time-chartered owner of a Norwegian tanker named the Mosli. On October 5, 1938, at Oslo, Norway, a charier party was entered into between defendant and Eastern States Petroleum Sales Corporation (hereinafter called 66 Eastern States ”) as charterer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Daly v. Chapman Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- R. J. Caldwell Co. v. Connecticut Mills Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- R.J. Caldwell Company, Inc. v. Connecticut Mills Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Bruner-Goodhue-Cooke-Cranz Agency Co. v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- E.B. Harper & Company, Incorporated v. Nortek, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Tankers International Navigation Corp. v. National Shipping & Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Weber v. AskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963