Legal Opinion

State v. Bosh

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2011No. 20100530PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice DURHAM,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

' 1 On interlocutory appeal, the State challenges the district court's grant of interven*790tion to Money & More Investors LLC (MMI) under rule 24 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. MMI sought intervention in the State's action against Larry Bosh and others to preserve assets pursuant to Utah Code section 77-382-601, claiming an interest in the assets. The State appeals the grant of intervention on two grounds: (1) the district court improperly granted intervention as of right under rule 24(a), and (2) the court abused its discretion by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Madison Square Garden Boxing, Inc. v. Earnie Shavers, Top Rank, Inc., Proposed Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Lima v. ChambersUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sunridge Development Corp. v. RB & G Engineering, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Drew v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Supernova Media, Inc. v. Shannon's Rainbow, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  3. Gardiner v. VanderwerffUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. GreenwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API