Legal Opinion

Drew v. Lee

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2011No. 20080798PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice NEHRING,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

T1 In this appeal, we determine whether Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(8)(B) requires parties to file a written expert report from treating physicians who plan to testify at trial. We hold that rule 26(a)(8)(B) requires parties to produce a written report only from experts who are "retained or specially employed" to testify and that treating physicians do not fall into this category. We therefore reverse the district court's decision and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BACKGROUND

T2 In October 2005, Richard Drew…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jesse A. Fielden v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Gass v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Patel v. GayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. State v. HarkerUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Arbogast Family Trust v. River Crossings, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. 2010-1 RADC/CADC Venture, LLC v. Dos Lagos, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Ladd v. BOWERS TRUCKING, INC.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  3. Norris v. FritzMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Brussow v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  5. Pulham v. KirslingUtah Supreme Court · 2019

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API